完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0075c 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0075c01
入有情無我。復依此餘說唯識教,受化者
T1590.001.0075c010075c02
能入所執法無我。謂若了知唯識現似色等
T1590.001.0075c020075c03
法起,此中都無色等相法,應受諸法無我教
T1590.001.0075c030075c04
者便能悟入諸法無我。若知諸法一切種無
T1590.001.0075c040075c05
入法無我,是則唯識亦畢竟無,何所安立?非
T1590.001.0075c050075c06
知諸法一切種無乃得名為入法無我,然達
T1590.001.0075c060075c07
愚夫遍計所執自性差別諸法無我,如是乃
T1590.001.0075c070075c08
名入法無我,非諸佛境離言法性亦都無故
T1590.001.0075c080075c09
名法無我。餘識所執此唯識性其體亦無,名
T1590.001.0075c090075c10
法無我。不爾,餘識所執境有,則唯識理應不
T1590.001.0075c100075c11
得成,許諸餘識有實境故。由此道理,說立唯
T1590.001.0075c110075c12
識教,普令悟入一切法無我,非一切種撥有
T1590.001.0075c120075c13
性故。復云何知佛依如是密意趣說有色等
T1590.001.0075c130075c14
處,非別實有色等外法為色等識各別境耶?
T1590.001.0075c140075c15
0075c16
以彼境非一,亦非多極微,
T1590.001.0075c160075c17
又非和合等,極微不成故。
T1590.001.0075c170075c18
論曰:此何所說?謂若實有外色等處與色等
T1590.001.0075c180075c19
識各別為境,如是外境或應是一,如勝論者
T1590.001.0075c190075c20
執有分色。或應是多,如執實有眾多極微各
T1590.001.0075c200075c21
別為境,或應多極微和合及和集,如執實有
T1590.001.0075c210075c22
眾多極微皆共和合和集為境。且彼外境理
T1590.001.0075c220075c23
應非一,有分色體異諸分色不可取故。理亦
T1590.001.0075c230075c24
非多,極微各別不可取故。又理非和合或和
T1590.001.0075c240075c25
集為境,一實極微理不成故。云何不成?頌
T1590.001.0075c250075c26
0075c27
極微與六合,一應成六分;
T1590.001.0075c270075c28
若與六同處,聚應如極微。
T1590.001.0075c280075c29
論曰:若一極微六方各與一極微合,應成六
T1590.001.0075c29