完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0400a 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0400a01
初周並悟也。次更論者,利根緣覺勝聲聞,可
T1720.005.0400a010400a02
得名上根。《釋論》云「鈍根緣覺不及身子」。若
T1720.005.0400a020400a03
爾,可得同下根三周說乃悟耳。菩薩不定,初
T1720.005.0400a030400a04
心、久行並是菩薩。今通論菩薩根有等聲聞
T1720.005.0400a040400a05
三品者,應三周並悟;利根菩薩與身子同
T1720.005.0400a050400a06
品者,聞初周即悟;中下二品亦爾也。但菩
T1720.005.0400a060400a07
薩執異迷輕,又無自保究竟之惑,故利鈍菩
T1720.005.0400a070400a08
薩聞初周皆悟。何以知之?下身子得記中,人
T1720.005.0400a080400a09
天八部知皆受記。故凡夫人雖復根鈍而惑
T1720.005.0400a090400a10
輕,身子雖復根利而惑重,故同是初周得
T1720.005.0400a100400a11
悟也。問:菩薩何故無領解耶?答:有人言菩
T1720.005.0400a110400a12
薩亦有領解,但《法華經》多不盡度耳。故〈方便
T1720.005.0400a120400a13
品〉云「菩薩聞是法,疑網皆已除」,即其證也。
T1720.005.0400a130400a14
有人言:聲聞有執異之病,又有自保之惑,故正
T1720.005.0400a140400a15
破之,所以有領解耳。菩薩無自保之病,設
T1720.005.0400a150400a16
有謂大異小、謂小異大,明菩薩自作佛、二乘
T1720.005.0400a160400a17
不作佛,一聞法華即得領悟。但破三歸一
T1720.005.0400a170400a18
正為二乘、傍為菩薩,故不述菩薩領解也。
T1720.005.0400a180400a19
問:聲聞聞經既得記,菩薩聞經何故不得受
T1720.005.0400a190400a20
記?答:以解領之言例記可知也。但〈提婆達
T1720.005.0400a200400a21
多品〉授龍女記,〈隨喜品〉云「聞《法華經》一句一
T1720.005.0400a210400a22
偈皆與受記」,下〈壽量品〉中自有菩薩得記也。
T1720.005.0400a220400a23
次會二經。問:《勝鬘經》云「三乘初業,不愚於
T1720.005.0400a230400a24
法,自知當得覺。」云何此經明三根羅漢,初則
T1720.005.0400a240400a25
生疑,後便得悟?答:舊經師云有事有理。言
T1720.005.0400a250400a26
其理者,三乘初業已知作佛,實無始疑之與
T1720.005.0400a260400a27
終悟,但符同凡夫,引初業之前外凡夫人,令
T1720.005.0400a270400a28
其信於一乘、必當作佛,故示始疑終悟耳。
T1720.005.0400a280400a29
教中為論,明二乘得果已後在遊觀心中,推
T1720.005.0400a29