完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0811a 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0811a01
他等四是計是依,不之一字是藥是理。窮生
T1735.040.0811a010811a02
之理不出自等,自等若無生將安寄?故以
T1735.040.0811a020811a03
不不之,則惑亡理顯。然其所計,略有三類:
T1735.040.0811a030811a04
一者外道,謂冥性為自、梵天為他、微塵和
T1735.040.0811a040811a05
合為共、自然為無因。又此四計亦是僧佉、衛
T1735.040.0811a050811a06
世、若提子、勒沙婆也。二小乘,同類因為自、異
T1735.040.0811a060811a07
熟因為他、俱有因為共、計無明支託虛而
T1735.040.0811a070811a08
起亦曰無因,上計亦通大乘執相之者。三
T1735.040.0811a080811a09
約大乘,果法為自、眾緣為他、合此為共、
T1735.040.0811a090811a10
離此為無因。又賴耶自種為自、眾緣為他、
T1735.040.0811a100811a11
合此為共、離此為無因。又法從真起為自、
T1735.040.0811a110811a12
從妄起為他、合此為共、離此為無因。所計
T1735.040.0811a120811a13
雖眾,但顯正理,諸計自妄。顯理復二:一約
T1735.040.0811a130811a14
無生以顯深觀、二約生無生無礙以顯深
T1735.040.0811a140811a15
觀。先中,略為二解:一約展轉釋,法從緣故
T1735.040.0811a150811a16
不自生。既無有自,對誰說他?又一切法總
T1735.040.0811a160811a17
為自故,又他望於他亦是自故,既無有他,
T1735.040.0811a170811a18
故不他生。自他不立,合誰為共?有因尚
T1735.040.0811a180811a19
不生,無因何得生?二約因緣形奪釋,故《對
T1735.040.0811a190811a20
法》云「自種有故不從他,待眾緣故非自作,
T1735.040.0811a200811a21
無作用故不共生,有功能故非無因。」論解
T1735.040.0811a210811a22
同此。若爾,自種有故則是自生,豈曰無生?
T1735.040.0811a220811a23
此乃假自破他,非立於自。次句假他遣自,
T1735.040.0811a230811a24
故《中論》云「如諸法自性,不在於緣中」也。下
T1735.040.0811a240811a25
二句例然,惟審詳之。二約無礙者,但因
T1735.040.0811a250811a26
緣生果各有二義,謂全有力、全無力。緣望於
T1735.040.0811a260811a27
果,若全有力,則因全無力,故云因不生緣生,
T1735.040.0811a270811a28
故云不自生。二因望果全有力亦然,故云
T1735.040.0811a280811a29
緣不生,自因生故,故不他生。三二力不俱,
T1735.040.0811a29