完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0330b 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0330b01
釋四空亦各有四,然此經中略無對治行,
T1733.012.0330b010330b02
論主準義置之。初所離中過色想者,依《成
T1733.012.0330b020330b03
實論》,遠離色想者,遠離香味觸想。滅有對
T1733.012.0330b030330b04
者,還滅色香味觸之想,以彼色等對礙故。不
T1733.012.0330b040330b05
念別異想者,滅緣聲想,以聲藉眾緣擊
T1733.012.0330b050330b06
發而生,故名別異。亦依大乘不同前說,謂
T1733.012.0330b060330b07
色雖多種,統攝為六,謂五塵及法處。要略
T1733.012.0330b070330b08
唯三:一可見有對,眼識所行;二不可見有對,
T1733.012.0330b080330b09
餘四識所行;三不可見無對,謂意識所行
T1733.012.0330b090330b10
表無表色等。此中過色想者,以離眼識所
T1733.012.0330b100330b11
行可見色想故。何故不言過色,但言過色
T1733.012.0330b110330b12
想耶?釋:以在色地修起此定,未捨色形
T1733.012.0330b120330b13
故。何故但言滅想,而不言餘心法耶?釋:理
T1733.012.0330b130330b14
實通有,以想取相強故。滅有對者,離餘四
T1733.012.0330b140330b15
識所行不可見有對四境色故,以想與心
T1733.012.0330b150330b16
俱名為和合,亦是心與境合故也。不念別
T1733.012.0330b160330b17
異想者,離意識所緣法處色想,論言意識分
T1733.012.0330b170330b18
別一切法故。說別異想者,以相隱重釋,謂
T1733.012.0330b180330b19
意識通緣一切諸法,於法處中簡取緣色
T1733.012.0330b190330b20
義邊意識想滅,緣餘意識此中不遣,舉其
T1733.012.0330b200330b21
所滅簡所不滅,故云別異。問:香味之想初
T1733.012.0330b210330b22
禪已離,色聲觸想二禪已除,今云何言空定
T1733.012.0330b220330b23
滅耶?答:遠釋云「治有四種:一壞對治,謂方
T1733.012.0330b230330b24
便道觀下有流無常等故;二斷對治,謂無礙
T1733.012.0330b240330b25
道正斷下過;三持對治,謂解脫道為首,及後
T1733.012.0330b250330b26
一切無間解脫持彼無為不令失壞;四遠
T1733.012.0330b260330b27
分對治,謂解脫道為首,及後一切無礙解脫
T1733.012.0330b270330b28
遠令前障畢竟不起。今此空定據第四治,
T1733.012.0330b280330b29
故說此離。」今更釋:於二禪中雖無色聲觸
T1733.012.0330b29