完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0661c 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0661c01
聖者說為苦,非聖說是樂。」
T1562.057.0661c010661c02
然四諦理無有差別,在聖在凡皆如實故,依
T1562.057.0661c020661c03
能見者偏立聖名。或義意言,唯諸聖者於四
T1562.057.0661c030661c04
諦理以聖行觀,於一切時行相無別,聖行諦
T1562.057.0661c040661c05
理極相稱故。以諦隨行立聖諦名,非如世間
T1562.057.0661c050661c06
六非聖行,先觀此地為靜等三,後復觀為麁
T1562.057.0661c060661c07
等三相,非相稱故不隨彼名。或義意言,唯諸
T1562.057.0661c070661c08
聖者於四諦理以聖智觀,一得正決定無還
T1562.057.0661c080661c09
不定理,故諦隨智得聖諦名。即由此理,聖智
T1562.057.0661c090661c10
觀諦得立苦集滅道智名。凡智雖能見四諦
T1562.057.0661c100661c11
理,得決定已容不定故,諦不隨彼得凡諦名,
T1562.057.0661c110661c12
由此但應名世俗智。唯受一分是苦自體所
T1562.057.0661c120661c13
餘並非,如何可言諸有漏行皆是苦諦?頌曰:
T1562.057.0661c130661c14
苦由三苦合,如所應一切,
T1562.057.0661c140661c15
可意非可意,餘有漏行法。
T1562.057.0661c150661c16
論曰:有三苦性,一苦苦性、二行苦性、三壞苦
T1562.057.0661c160661c17
性。諸有漏行如其所應,與此三種苦性合故,
T1562.057.0661c170661c18
皆是苦諦亦無有失。所以者何?諸有漏行有
T1562.057.0661c180661c19
三,可意、非可意、餘。可意者何?謂諸樂受,及彼
T1562.057.0661c190661c20
資具。餘二類然。此中可意有漏行法,由壞苦
T1562.057.0661c200661c21
合故名為苦,未離染者於彼壞時,必定應生
T1562.057.0661c210661c22
憂愁等故。以薄伽梵契經中言:諸樂受,生時
T1562.057.0661c220661c23
樂、住時樂,壞時苦。順樂受諸行,如樂受應知。
T1562.057.0661c230661c24
諸非可意有漏行法,由苦苦合故名為苦,苦
T1562.057.0661c240661c25
受自體及順苦法現前必能惱身心故。以薄
T1562.057.0661c250661c26
伽梵契經中言:諸苦受,生時苦、住時苦,壞時
T1562.057.0661c260661c27
樂。順苦受諸行,如苦受應知。除此所餘有漏
T1562.057.0661c270661c28
行法,由行苦合故名為苦。因緣所造皆是無
T1562.057.0661c280661c29
常,有漏無常無非是苦,故有漏法皆是苦性。
T1562.057.0661c29