完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0902b 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0902b01
耶?答:俱有依中含共不共,聖道等位第六
T1833.004.0902b010902b02
意識彼亦許有共俱有依,宗法之中既不
T1833.004.0902b020902b03
別言,故無不定。
T1833.004.0902b030902b04
疏:「若成前總宗至意識無依」者。有義彈云:無
T1833.004.0902b040902b05
學、聖道意識皆在有法中收,豈得約宗有
T1833.004.0902b050902b06
法之中有不定耶?詳曰:夫五不定因於
T1833.004.0902b060902b07
二喻,或有或無,無所立處即為異喻。立者
T1833.004.0902b070902b08
雖立聖道等意在有法中,然後陳宗聖意
T1833.004.0902b080902b09
非有,以理而言合居異喻,因既於轉,何非
T1833.004.0902b090902b10
不定?誰望有法出不定耶?若言前立在有
T1833.004.0902b100902b11
法中,如何復言是異法者?斯亦無爽,前依
T1833.004.0902b110902b12
總立云有法收,出過據理合居異品。亦
T1833.004.0902b120902b13
如古立宗因違云,如立聲常;一切皆是無
T1833.004.0902b130902b14
常故,因。陳那正云:一切皆是無常故者,而是
T1833.004.0902b140902b15
異喻,非是因也。彼既以理正因為喻,今亦
T1833.004.0902b150902b16
以理正宗為異,亦何失乎?又《因明論》云:異
T1833.004.0902b160902b17
法者若於是處,說所立無。釋除所立外
T1833.004.0902b170902b18
所餘法處,但無所立即宗異法,聖道等意,既
T1833.004.0902b180902b19
無所立,為異何咎?若不爾者,於是處言攝
T1833.004.0902b190902b20
無所立法不盡也。止濫不窮,便諸過起,由
T1833.004.0902b200902b21
斯疏判理固無違。
T1833.004.0902b210902b22
疏:「若以六識至無第七」者。有義彈云:別宗
T1833.004.0902b220902b23
如前宗違比量,因無不定已成似量,外
T1833.004.0902b230902b24
量如前之支無過,因云第六意識攝故;
T1833.004.0902b240902b25
如無學等第六意識。外人豈將真量與似
T1833.004.0902b250902b26
量為不定過耶?若彼外量取因量因云
T1833.004.0902b260902b27
六識攝,亦有不定之失,此即共不定,如
T1833.004.0902b270902b28
何說有決定過耶?此彈意云:相違決定
T1833.004.0902b280902b29
前後兩家之支並具。今者前量六識攝因已
T1833.004.0902b29