完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0400b 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0400b01
契經言:此天同分、此人同分,乃至廣說。就界
T1562.012.0400b010400b02
趣生處身等別,有無量種有情同分。復有法
T1562.012.0400b020400b03
同分,謂隨蘊處界,異生同分入離生時捨,有
T1562.012.0400b030400b04
情同分入涅槃時捨。豈不異生性即異生同
T1562.012.0400b040400b05
分?此不應然,所作異故。謂彼身形業用樂欲
T1562.012.0400b050400b06
互相似因,名為同分。若與聖道成就相違,是
T1562.012.0400b060400b07
異生因,名異生性。入離生時,於眾同分亦捨
T1562.012.0400b070400b08
亦得,於異生性捨而不得。同分非色,如何得
T1562.012.0400b080400b09
知?有用能生無別事類,由見彼果,知有彼故。
T1562.012.0400b090400b10
如見現在業所得果,知有前生曾所作業。又
T1562.012.0400b100400b11
觀行者現證知故。何不許有無情同分?不應
T1562.012.0400b110400b12
如是責,有大過失故。汝亦許有人天等趣胎
T1562.012.0400b120400b13
卵等生,何不亦許菴羅等趣菉豆等生?又佛
T1562.012.0400b130400b14
世尊曾不說故。但應思擇何故世尊唯於有
T1562.012.0400b140400b15
情說有同分,非於草等。復云何知如是同分
T1562.012.0400b150400b16
別有實物?且我於中作如是解,由彼草等無
T1562.012.0400b160400b17
有展轉業用樂欲互相似故,於彼不說別有
T1562.012.0400b170400b18
同分。又必因有情,草等方生故,唯於有情說
T1562.012.0400b180400b19
有同分。又因先業及現勤勇此法得生,於彼
T1562.012.0400b190400b20
草等二事皆無,故無同分。即由此事,證有實
T1562.012.0400b200400b21
物。又木素漆彫畫等像及彼真形,雖有色形
T1562.012.0400b210400b22
展轉相似,而言一實。由此非唯見彼相似即
T1562.012.0400b220400b23
言是實,要於相似差別物類方起實言,故知
T1562.012.0400b230400b24
實有此差別法。此實言說,由此法生。又前說
T1562.012.0400b240400b25
故。前說云何?謂見身形是更相似業所引
T1562.012.0400b250400b26
果,諸根業用及飲食等有差別故。是諸同
T1562.012.0400b260400b27
分展轉差別,如何於彼更無同分而起無別
T1562.012.0400b270400b28
覺施設耶?由諸同分是同類事等因性故,即
T1562.012.0400b280400b29
為同類展轉相似覺施設因。如眼耳等由大
T1562.012.0400b29