完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0441b 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0441b01
猶如糞土,則業煩惱類應名隨界。如何說六
T1562.018.0441b010441b02
處為隨界耶?非由糞土資熏種故,還令生起
T1562.018.0441b020441b03
糞土類芽,故種唯應喻於六處。由此六處業
T1562.018.0441b030441b04
煩惱熏,生當六處異熟果故。此救非理,非後
T1562.018.0441b040441b05
六處果即說用前六處為因故。謂經說眼等
T1562.018.0441b050441b06
業煩惱為因,如種為因生於芽等。非芽等用
T1562.018.0441b060441b07
糞等為因,故彼所救非為應理。又經說生業
T1562.018.0441b070441b08
為因故,非當六處。六處為種,非業煩惱為因
T1562.018.0441b080441b09
感生,可執六處為其種子。故眼等五,於感當
T1562.018.0441b090441b10
生全無勝用;意處或有與業煩惱同一果義,
T1562.018.0441b100441b11
故所立喻與法相違。或種相續與彼糞土相
T1562.018.0441b110441b12
續俱時能生異果。諸業煩惱相續久滅,而計
T1562.018.0441b120441b13
六處相續為因,生業煩惱所牽異果。如斯法
T1562.018.0441b130441b14
喻豈得言同?又種糞土俱有分故,芽中可有
T1562.018.0441b140441b15
二果續生,如何可與無分有分同招一果為
T1562.018.0441b150441b16
同法喻?若執芽中糞土與種果體無別,是則
T1562.018.0441b160441b17
能喻與所立同,俱不成故。又彼為證舊隨界
T1562.018.0441b170441b18
有,所引聖言有隨俱行善根未斷。此經還證
T1562.018.0441b180441b19
彼所妄執舊隨界無,以諸善根無貪等性,彼
T1562.018.0441b190441b20
於此位不現在前,得未捨故名為未斷。依將
T1562.018.0441b200441b21
斷善故說此言。此中善根唯生得善,諸加行
T1562.018.0441b210441b22
善先已斷故。生得善根於續善位隨染心
T1562.018.0441b220441b23
得,故謂隨行九品頓得,故謂俱行。或此善根
T1562.018.0441b230441b24
先得後起,故謂隨行。現起與得不相違害,故
T1562.018.0441b240441b25
謂俱行。是謂此經此句實義。善根斷者亦現
T1562.018.0441b250441b26
無此隨俱善根,故此經言彼於後時一切皆
T1562.018.0441b260441b27
斷。隨俱善根既舊隨界,此善根無,故彼隨界
T1562.018.0441b270441b28
亦無。隨界既無,後因何法善根續起?又初續
T1562.018.0441b280441b29
位善根現無,應無隨界。既無隨界,何緣名續
T1562.018.0441b29