完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0061a 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0061a01
未說法僧,故須辨之。三者說權歸,未曾顯
T1744.003.0061a010061a02
實,故須辨之。四者昔說別歸,未說一體,故
T1744.003.0061a020061a03
須辨之。問:上明二乘有怖無四智,今明二乘
T1744.003.0061a030061a04
無究竟歸,須歸依佛。此二何異?答:略有三種
T1744.003.0061a040061a05
義異。一自他異。二乘無四智、佛有四智,此論
T1744.003.0061a050061a06
自德;三歸論化他德,二乘猶須歸他、不能為
T1744.003.0061a060061a07
他作歸,佛則為他作歸、不須歸他。二人法
T1744.003.0061a070061a08
異。四智中但就人明,二乘人四智非究竟,佛
T1744.003.0061a080061a09
究竟;三歸中,明二乘法僧非究竟,一乘法僧
T1744.003.0061a090061a10
是究竟。三者有無異。會二乘歸一乘,無復二
T1744.003.0061a100061a11
乘;會別體歸入一體歸,猶有三歸。問:何故
T1744.003.0061a110061a12
非類?答:三歸是佛始終教門。昔為翻邪三,明
T1744.003.0061a120061a13
別體正三;今對別體三,故明一體三。故始終
T1744.003.0061a130061a14
皆明有三歸也。三乘義則不爾。昔為眾生未
T1744.003.0061a140061a15
堪受一,故於一說三,以三乘調柔其心;竟堪
T1744.003.0061a150061a16
受於一,是故會三同歸於一,則無復三乘。故
T1744.003.0061a160061a17
與此非類。問:何故始終並說三歸?答:昔說三
T1744.003.0061a170061a18
歸,凡有三義:一為翻邪三明正三。但邪三有
T1744.003.0061a180061a19
二種:一者事天有邪三,如以自在天等為佛、
T1744.003.0061a190061a20
所說教為法、行法人為僧。二者事人邪三,如
T1744.003.0061a200061a21
迦毘羅等為佛、僧佉經等為法、行此法者為
T1744.003.0061a210061a22
僧。為翻此三邪,故以如來為佛、所說經為法、
T1744.003.0061a220061a23
行法者為僧。二者治病說三。眾生有煩惱病,
T1744.003.0061a230061a24
以佛為良醫、法為妙藥、僧為看病人。具此三
T1744.003.0061a240061a25
種,煩惱病差。為此義故,所以說三。三者為免
T1744.003.0061a250061a26
三怖。如鹿為獵師所逐,得三跳故,則便免
T1744.003.0061a260061a27
怖。眾生為生死魔所逐,歸依三寶,得免生死
T1744.003.0061a270061a28
怖。今說一體三者,明昔三歸異體是無常,
T1744.003.0061a280061a29
法無常法故非究竟。如《涅槃》云「如汝父母,
T1744.003.0061a29