完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0540b 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0540b01
瞋犯第三戒,上中犯者即失,下品不失,若慳
T1828.010.0540b010540b02
犯第二戒,上品即失,中下不失,若合三品犯
T1828.010.0540b020540b03
第一戒者皆不失,聲聞不爾,故云菩薩無無
T1828.010.0540b030540b04
餘犯。一解:聲聞戒中一切煩惱並犯戒,故云
T1828.010.0540b040540b05
言無餘犯,菩薩戒中起貪煩惱或不犯,若利
T1828.010.0540b050540b06
益有情貪不犯菩薩戒,為自利益即犯菩薩
T1828.010.0540b060540b07
戒,若瞋煩惱為自為他並能犯戒,故云無無
T1828.010.0540b070540b08
餘犯。明度無極經中,貪瞋相對分別失戒,瞋
T1828.010.0540b080540b09
上品失戒,中下不失,貪三品犯不失戒。次明
T1828.010.0540b090540b10
須受分齊,多分應共瞋所起犯,非貪所起者,
T1828.010.0540b100540b11
景云:起瞋犯戒,起貪不犯。若依舊論,如世尊
T1828.010.0540b110540b12
說:菩薩起瞋,瞋惱犯應更受,非受貪欲犯。測
T1828.010.0540b120540b13
云:問:前說四他勝處法中貪犯亦失,云何此
T1828.010.0540b130540b14
非貪?答:若依舊論,但言染犯失戒非貪,是故前
T1828.010.0540b140540b15
後相違。今依新論,既云:多分在瞋,即知貪犯
T1828.010.0540b150540b16
亦失。是故前後兩文,不相違也。言非非所犯
T1828.010.0540b160540b17
者,簡非瞋所起。下明犯之輕重,如攝事分應
T1828.010.0540b170540b18
當了知者,舊論中,錯云:如四攝品應當了知。
T1828.010.0540b180540b19
遠師云:四攝品中,無此義,不知為指何經四
T1828.010.0540b190540b20
攝耶?彼不知此論,別有攝事分第九十九卷
T1828.010.0540b200540b21
說。上明依戒修學。如是菩薩依正一切自毘
T1828.010.0540b210540b22
奈耶下,第二明學戒勝利得三圓滿。如是若
T1828.010.0540b220540b23
略廣宣說已下,大文第三結上在家出家戒
T1828.010.0540b230540b24
文。如是廣宣說者,結上廣明三聚戒文。
T1828.010.0540b240540b25
第四十二卷
T1828.010.0540b250540b26
難行戒有三:第三中,准舊論即有三一切。一、
T1828.010.0540b260540b27
一切修行;二、一切住定;三、一切憶念。一切門
T1828.010.0540b270540b28
戒,有四。一、正受戒,即從他正受及自淨心受;
T1828.010.0540b280540b29
二、本性戒,謂十信已前由性種力所起身語
T1828.010.0540b29