完整原文 · 分页阅读 当前仅加载大正藏 0561a 版页;异文与注释未混入正文,稳定行号可直接引用。
0561a01
計度,無明迷故。《佛地論》說:有義:法執及無明
T1830.009.0561a010561a02
遍三性有漏心品及二乘無漏心品,皆不
T1830.009.0561a020561a03
了達法無我故,皆似相分、見分起故。前卷
T1830.009.0561a030561a04
已說。此障中無,但護法師伏遮彼計。若言
T1830.009.0561a040561a05
法執,何藉惠俱?
T1830.009.0561a050561a06
論:法空智品與俱起故。述曰:菩薩法空智
T1830.009.0561a060561a07
品許與此第八識俱起故。第七有法執,法
T1830.009.0561a070561a08
空智起即不行。第八法執有,法空智起此應
T1830.009.0561a080561a09
滅。既八現行與彼俱起,定知第八無法執
T1830.009.0561a090561a10
俱。量云:第八識等定非法執品;法空觀品
T1830.009.0561a100561a11
與俱起故;如佛第八識。若言因中法空觀
T1830.009.0561a110561a12
起第八許斷,即無漏法無所熏故,佛何得
T1830.009.0561a120561a13
成?不可言熏鏡智俱識,非無記故,猶未
T1830.009.0561a130561a14
得故。第八異熟既爾,餘識異熟應然。然今
T1830.009.0561a140561a15
七識總合為法,又下異熟心許是法執故,
T1830.009.0561a150561a16
不可為例,於《佛地論》此論勝也。
T1830.009.0561a160561a17
論:七轉識內至如煩惱說。述曰:無離煩
T1830.009.0561a170561a18
惱別起執故,故數與彼煩惱等同。七識之
T1830.009.0561a180561a19
中根本有四,隨惑有八,及別境惠有十三
T1830.009.0561a190561a20
法。第六識有一切,五識有根本三、隨惑十,
T1830.009.0561a200561a21
與十三法俱。
T1830.009.0561a210561a22
何故五識無見、疑等?
T1830.009.0561a220561a23
論:眼等五識至皆容引起。述曰:無計度分
T1830.009.0561a230561a24
別故,法見、疑等定不相應。等者,等取隨中
T1830.009.0561a240561a25
諸惑,與此五識不俱起故,即忿等十全、餘
T1830.009.0561a250561a26
十少分。計度分別之所生者,五識皆無,非
T1830.009.0561a260561a27
無見道所斷諸惑名無分別,就見道中無
T1830.009.0561a270561a28
緣邪友師,自分別諸惑,而實非無意識所
T1830.009.0561a280561a29
引見道諸惑名無分別。《對法》等云:分別起
T1830.009.0561a29